The Supreme Court has dismissed Alberto González Amador’s defamation case against María Jesús Montero, the First Vice-President of the Government. Amador, who is in a relationship with Isabel Díaz Ayuso, the President of the Community of Madrid, sought forty thousand euros in damages, alleging that Montero’s comments, labelling him a ‘confessed delinquent’ and suggesting that he resides in a property financed through tax fraud, infringed on his right to honour.

The court determined that Montero’s statements were legitimate political criticisms protected under freedom of expression. The Civil Chamber ruled that these remarks function as a part of the political discourse, especially concerning individuals in the public eye.

The court noted that it is common to critique the familial contexts of politicians, particularly when there are suspicions of criminal conduct. They affirmed the statements were relevant to public interest and affected a prominent individual linked to significant political figures.

Moreover, the court highlighted that Montero’s comments did not include insults or derogatory expressions and were articulated by an elected representative within a legitimate political debate. The judgement underscored the importance of protecting freedoms in discussions regarding public matters, especially involving elected officials.